Blog

Why You Gas Out During Cardio Intervals (And How to Fix It)

You're 45 seconds into a 90-second sprint on the assault bike. Your legs are burning, your lungs are screaming, and your pace has dropped by 30%. The first 20 seconds felt easy—you were flying. Now you're just trying to survive.

This isn't a fitness problem. It's a pacing problem.

Most people approach conditioning pieces like a drag race: hammer from the gun, hold on as long as possible. It feels right. Going easy at the start feels like wasting time.

But your body doesn't work that way. And understanding why changes everything about how you pace longer efforts.

The Aerobic System Lag

When you start any physical effort, your body needs energy immediately. But your aerobic system (the one that burns oxygen efficiently and can sustain output) doesn't activate instantly. It takes 40-60 seconds to fully spin up.

So for the first minute of any effort, you're running primarily on anaerobic energy. This system is powerful but limited. Think of it as a small battery that drains fast. Once it's depleted, you hit the wall.

Research on oxygen uptake kinetics shows that VO2 (oxygen consumption) reaches steady state within approximately 3 minutes during moderate-intensity exercise, with the aerobic contribution increasing progressively over the first 60-90 seconds of higher-intensity work.

Translation: The longer your conditioning piece, the more you need your aerobic system. But if you go all-out before it's online, you've already dug yourself into oxygen debt.

The 40-60 Second Wall

You've felt this. Maybe on a rower, bike, or running intervals. The pattern is always the same:

This isn't mental weakness. It's physiology. You've depleted your anaerobic capacity before your aerobic system fully activated. Now you're trying to continue at high intensity while in oxygen debt—and your body forces you to slow down.

The trap is that the first 20 seconds feel deceptively easy. You're not breathing hard yet. Your legs feel fresh. So you push. Hard.

But that ease is a lie. You're borrowing from a credit card with a brutal interest rate.

Short vs. Long Conditioning Pieces

Here's the key distinction that changes how you should pace:

Short pieces (20-40 seconds): These are genuinely anaerobic efforts. Your aerobic system won't contribute much anyway. Go hard from the start. Sprint mechanics, max power, full send. You'll be done before the debt catches up.

Longer pieces (60-120 seconds): These are aerobic-anaerobic hybrid efforts. You need your aerobic system to sustain output. If you blow your anaerobic reserves in the first 20 seconds, the remaining 40-100 seconds will be brutal.

The 40-60 second range is the transition zone. These can go either way depending on your goals and the workout structure. But anything beyond 60 seconds demands pacing strategy.

The Ramp-Up Principle

For conditioning pieces lasting 60 seconds or longer, use a ramp-up approach:

First 15-20 seconds: Start 1-2 RPE below target

This will feel absurdly easy. Too slow. Like you're sandbagging.

Here's the objection everyone has: "If I'm not breathing hard, I'm not working hard enough."

But intensity and effort aren't the same thing. You're still working—you're just not immediately burying yourself in oxygen debt. The hard work comes in the middle and finish when your aerobic system is online and you can sustain it.

If your target is RPE 8 (hard, breathing heavily), start at RPE 6-7 (moderate, controlled breathing). You should feel like you could talk in short sentences.

Middle section: Build to target as breathing settles

As your aerobic system spins up, gradually increase intensity. You'll notice your breathing finding a rhythm. Your heart rate stabilizes. You're no longer just burning through anaerobic reserves—you're pulling from a sustainable energy system.

For a 90-second piece, spend seconds 20-60 building to your target RPE. Don't jump there immediately. Ramp up progressively.

Final third: At or slightly above target RPE

Once you're aerobically engaged and nearing the end, you can push above target. Now you're using your anaerobic reserves strategically—as a finishing kick, not as the primary fuel source.

For that same 90-second piece at RPE 8:

Why This Works: Higher Average Output

Here's the counterintuitive part: Starting slow gives you a higher average output over the full duration.

Let's say you're doing 90 seconds on the rower. You can go all-out and hold:

Or you can ramp up:

The second approach covers more distance. You maintain higher power output in the middle and finish strong instead of collapsing.

This strategic distribution of effort allows you to maintain higher average power throughout the duration. While some research on short-duration efforts (like Bishop et al., 2002, studying 2-minute kayak performance) found benefits to aggressive starts due to faster VO2 kinetics, these studies typically examined single maximal efforts, not repeated rounds where recovery between pieces matters.

Starting conservatively doesn't mean you're going easy. It means you're distributing your effort intelligently.

Recovery Between Rounds

The ramp-up principle doesn't just improve individual piece performance. It dramatically affects your ability to recover for the next round.

When you go all-out from the start, you accumulate massive oxygen debt. Your body spends the entire rest period trying to pay it back. You start the next round still compromised.

When you pace intelligently, you accumulate less debt. Your rest periods become actual recovery, not desperate gasping. By the third or fourth round, the difference is enormous.

This is especially important in circuit-style workouts where you're hitting multiple conditioning pieces. Each one affects the next. Sustainable pacing across rounds beats unsustainable heroics on round one.

When to Ignore This Advice

There are times when the ramp-up principle doesn't apply:

True sprint pieces (20-40 seconds): As mentioned, these are anaerobic by nature. Go hard immediately.

Single-effort tests or competitions: If you're doing one max-effort piece and don't need to repeat it, you can afford to blow up. Leave it all out there.

Competition-scored workouts: If you're doing a CrossFit-style workout where speed determines your ranking, the calculus changes. You might accept worse performance in later rounds to bank time early. Research on pacing strategies (Abbiss & Laursen, 2008) notes that while even pacing may theoretically optimize performance in events lasting over 2 minutes, many athletes—even elite ones—tend to adopt positive pacing strategies (fast start, gradual slowdown) under competitive pressure. The key is understanding the trade-offs.

Strategic blowouts: Sometimes the workout calls for going absolutely max and learning to suffer. That's a different training stimulus—embracing discomfort, pushing mental limits. Just know what you're signing up for.

But for the vast majority of conditioning work—repeated pieces, circuit training, anything where you need to go again—pacing matters.

How BringHIIT Helps You Pace

This is exactly why BringHIIT shows conditioning duration upfront before each piece starts.

When you see "Ski Erg: 90 seconds" pop up on screen, you know immediately: this is a longer piece. Start conservative, build into it.

When you see "Assault Bike: 25 seconds," you know: this is a sprint. Go hard from the jump.

The app also displays target RPE for each conditioning piece (typically 7-10 scale, since anything below RPE 7 isn't really conditioning). But knowing the duration lets you plan your ramp:

The circuit structure means you'll hit multiple conditioning pieces per workout. Pacing each one intelligently compounds across rounds. By the final circuit, you're still moving well instead of crawling through pieces 30% slower than round one.

What This Feels Like in Practice

The hardest part of the ramp-up principle is psychological. Starting easy feels wrong.

Your brain screams: "You're wasting time! Go harder!"

Your workout partner is flying out of the gate. You look slow.

But 30 seconds later, you're still accelerating while they're fading. At 60 seconds, you're passing them. You finish strong. They finish broken.

It takes discipline. Especially in group settings where everyone else is sprinting from the start. But once you experience the difference—maintaining power through the final third instead of dying at 45 seconds—you won't go back.

Practical Application: Know Before You Go

Here's the simple framework:

Step 1: Check the duration

Before you start the piece, know how long it lasts. This determines your pacing strategy.

Step 2: Pick your starting effort

Step 3: Build intelligently

Don't jump to target immediately. Ramp up progressively over the first third to half of the piece.

Step 4: Finish strong

Use the final 20-30 seconds to push at or above target. This is where you empty the tank.

Step 5: Breathe during rest

If you paced well, your rest periods become actual recovery. Focus on deep, controlled breathing. You should be ready to go again.

The Mental Shift

Pacing conditioning isn't about going easy. It's about going smart.

The goal isn't to "survive" each piece. It's to maximize total output across all pieces in the workout. That requires treating your anaerobic capacity as a limited resource and your aerobic system as the workhorse that needs time to activate.

You've probably been taught to go all-out on conditioning. That advice makes sense for genuine sprints. The problem is that most conditioning pieces in mixed-modal workouts aren't sprints. They're 60-120 second efforts that require a hybrid approach. The old advice doesn't scale to longer durations.

Athletes who learn to pace well don't look impressive in the first 20 seconds. They look impressive at the finish line—and in round four when everyone else has fallen apart.

Sprint coaches have known this forever. Watch an elite 400m or 800m race. The winners aren't the ones who lead at 100m. They're the ones who controlled the first 200m and had something left for the final straight.

The same principle applies to your conditioning pieces. The assault bike doesn't care about your ego. It cares about sustainable power output. Give your aerobic system time to activate, and you'll move faster for longer.

Common Questions

"Does this apply to running intervals too, or just equipment-based conditioning?"

The physiology is identical. Whether you're on a rower, bike, treadmill, or running outside, your aerobic system still takes 40-60 seconds to fully activate. The ramp-up principle applies to all conditioning modalities lasting 60+ seconds.

The main difference is that running requires more pacing discipline—it's easier to overcook the start when you're not watching a monitor showing your exact pace dropping in real-time.

"What if I can't accurately gauge RPE as a beginner?"

Start with breathing as your guide:

If you're truly a beginner, start on the conservative side. You'll learn quickly how different efforts feel, and you can adjust upward in future rounds. It's much easier to add intensity than to recover from going too hard too soon.

"My coach/program tells me to go all-out on conditioning pieces. Is this advice wrong?"

Not necessarily. Context matters. If your program prescribes true sprint intervals (20-40 seconds) or single-effort pieces where you don't need to repeat, all-out makes sense.

But if you're doing repeated 60-120 second pieces in a circuit and consistently dying by round three, try pacing strategically for a few sessions. Let your results speak for themselves. Track your total distance or calories across all rounds—not just round one.

Start Slower, Finish Faster

Next time you see a 90-second conditioning piece coming, resist the urge to hammer from the start.

Take the first 15 seconds easy. Feel the aerobic system spin up. Build into your target effort. Then finish strong.

You'll cover more distance, recover faster, and perform better on the next round.

That's not sandbagging. That's pacing.

References

Abbiss, C. R., & Laursen, P. B. (2008). Describing and understanding pacing strategies during athletic competition. Sports Medicine, 38(3), 239-252.

Bishop, D., Bonetti, D., & Dawson, B. (2002). The influence of pacing strategy on VO2 and supramaximal kayak performance. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 34(6), 1041-1047.